unit lesson plans header
Creative Thinking & Making
Historical & Cultural Contexts
Critical Thinking
Critical Response
Aesthetics
At a Glance:

Suggested Time Frame:

PowerPoint Part 2:                10 mins
Writing Activity:                     10 mins
Pair Discussion:                     10 mins
Group Dialogue:                   30 mins
Assessment:                          15 mins

Total Time:                       1 -1 ½ hrs.

Image Gallery
Lesson 3 Image Gallery >

Printable Version
Download this Lesson >

Links

Teacher Reflections
Submit a review >

Assessment:

•Students may use the graphic organizer to assess their own perceptions, thoughts, and existing questions about the concepts in this lesson.
•Teachers may use the rubric to evaluate their class participation and writing.

Learning Objectives and Cognitive Skills:

•Students observe an artwork and answer writing prompts to document their personal aesthetic experience.
•In groups of two, students analyze a philosophical quote in relationship to an artwork.
•Students synthesize existing philosophies and develop their own theories about aesthetics and beauty through group dialogue.

PA State Standards:

Arts and Humanities:

9.2. I.  Identify, explain, and analyze philosophical beliefs as they relate to works in the arts.
Critical  Response

9.3. E.  Interpret and use various types of critical analysis in the arts and humanities.
• Contextual criticism
• Formal criticism
• Intuitive criticism
Aesthetic Response

9.4.12. A. Evaluate an individual’s philosophical statement on a work in the arts and its relationship to one’s own life based on knowledge and experience.

Reading, Writing, Speaking, and Listening Speaking and Listening


1.6.11. A.  Listen to others.
• Ask clarifying questions.
• Synthesize information, ideas, and opinions to determine relevancy.

Lesson 1

Lesson 2

Lesson 3

Lesson 4

Lesson 5


Aesthetics Lesson 3: Aesthetics and Beauty
Jump to: Group Dialogue | Adaptation | Activity | Image Gallery | At a Glance

 

Andy Warhol’s Flowers, paintings installation at The
Andy Warhol Museum, Pittsburgh. ©AWF



Procedure:

1. Review the objects students have brought in and explore why they consider these objects to be “not art.”

2. View the PowerPoint Presentation Part 2

3. Use the Handout Aesthetics 3.1 while viewing Andy Warhol’s Electric Chair print. (You may substitute Warhol’s Flowers prints or his camouflaged Self-Portrait)
Students should fill in the first three writing prompts to foster their own personal aesthetic experience.

 

Andy Warhol,
Electric Chair, Published Edition, 137/250, 1971 Screen print on paper 35 1/2 x 48 in. ©AWF

4. Pair Share Reflection: In groups of two discuss the following quotes. Do you agree with these opinions? How does it relate to the Electric Chair print (or other work)?

What a strange illusion it is to suppose that beauty is goodness.
-Leo Tolstoy

Art Always serves beauty, and beauty is the joy of possessing form, and form is the key to organic llife since no living thing can exist without it.
-Boris Pasternak (1840- 1921) English poet, critic, biographer

Back to Top


5. Group Dialogue: Use the following questions as prompts at the start of and during the dialogue:

  1. Are Andy Warhol’s Electric Chairs (or other work) beautiful? Why or why not?
  2. How do Warhol’s choices and treatment of the subject matter make the paintings beautiful or ugly?
  3. What do you think was Warhol’s intention with these works? Was he trying to make the death penalty (or another concept) seem beautiful or ugly?
  4. Do artworks always relay the meanings that the artist intended them to have?
  5. Do artworks have to be beautiful or pretty? Can something that is ugly be considered art?
  6. Who decides what is beautiful or ugly?
  7. If an artwork makes someone feel sad or bad, can it still be considered good? Why?
  8. Do these paintings have value? What kind of value, aesthetic value or monetary?

6. Compare and contrast a Warhol work to one from the Carnegie Museum of Art. Revisit the questions above using the two works to support or refute answers.

Possible pairings are:
For viewing see Image Gallery

Warhol’s Electric Chair and
Armchair, 17th century
36 x W: 25 1/4 x D: 20 7/8 inches (H: 91 x W: 64 x D: 53 cm) Gift of Baroness Cassel Van Doorn
58.25.80

Warhol’s camouflaged Self-Portrait and
Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn
Self-Portrait with Raised Sabre, 1634
etching with touches of burin:
H: 4 7/8 x W: 4 1/16 inches (H: 12 x W: 10 cm) Bequest of Charles J. Rosenbloom, by exchange

Warhol’s Flowers prints and
Bow Porcelain Factory
Bouquet of Flowers c. 1755
porcelain: 9 1/4 x W: 7 1/2 inches (H: 24 x W: 19 cm) Ailsa Mellon Bruce Collection
32.1977

 

Back to Top


Adaptation:

For Higher Level Extension: Explain the three fields of philosophy:

Metaphysics: the philosophy of being; the branch of philosophy concerned with the study of the nature of being and beings, existence, time and space, and causality.

Epistemology: theory of knowledge; the branch of philosophy that studies the nature of knowledge, in particular its foundations, scope, and validity.

Ethics: the study of morality’s effect on conduct.

 

Museum Workshop participants discuss Andy Warhol's Electric Chair prints and their views about the artist's intentions.

Review Questions:

Questions to determine what is real and what exists (Metaphysics):

  • If this were a billboard instead of a work hung in a gallery would it be art?
  • Does Warhol’s use of photographic silkscreen make this work more realistic?
  • Is this painting objective or subjective in relation to its subject, an electric chair?

Questions to determine what we can know as truth (Epistemology):

  • What do we learn about capital punishment in this piece?
  • What do we learn about Warhol?
  • What would it mean if the original photograph for this painting was staged by Warhol instead of a documentary photo?

Questions to determine what we think is good in ethics and in art (Values/Ethics) 

  • What value does this artwork have?
  • Is this painting beautiful?
  • What values would be reflected if this room was part of your school?
  • What would be the ethical implications if a majority of Americans agreed to hang this painting in their living rooms?

Activity:

For homework, students should take the object they’ve brought in that “isn’t art,” and wrap it in a material of their choice in order to transform its aesthetics. See pictures

This activity was created by Megan Bonistalli, Art Teacher at Seneca Valley High School. For complete lesson, go to Everyday Objects and Transformation Activity


Back to Top

 

Home