![]() |
|||||
![]() Image Gallery Links PA State Standards: Arts and Humanities: 9.3.8 D Evaluate works in the arts and humanities using a complex vocabulary of critical response. Learning Objectives and Cognitive Skills: Compare and Contrast |
|
||||
![]() |
Andy Warhol, "Screen Test: Jane Holzer," 1964. 16mm film, black and white, four minutes, Collection of The Andy Warhol Museum, Founding Collection, Contribution the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. © 2006 The Andy Warhol Museum, Pittsburgh, All rights reserved. |
Warhol’s Screen Tests are revealing portraits of hundreds of different individuals, shot between 1963 and 1966. The subjects include both famous and anonymous visitors to Warhol’s studio, including poet Allen Ginsberg, actor Dennis Hopper, and artist Salvador Dali, along with many other diverse individuals. When asked to pose, subjects were lit and filmed by Warhol’s stationary 16mm Bolex camera on silent, black and white, 100-foot rolls of film. Each Screen Test is exactly the same length, lasting only as long as the roll of film. The standard formula of subject and camera remaining almost motionless for the duration of the film, results in a “living portrait.” The films, projected in slow motion, last four minutes each. Outside of Warhol’s standardized process there are subtle lighting and focus variations in the Screen Tests. Jane Holzer’s is in soft focus and suffused with light, creating an ethereal, hypnotic effect while Piero Heliczer’s is darker in mood. In addition, there are a number of Screen Tests that diverge from this format entirely, the sitter purposely moving, gesticulating, or using props.
“Beauties in photographs are different from beauties in person. It must be hard to be a model, because you’d want to be like the photograph of you, and you can’t ever look that way. And so you start to copy the photograph. Photographs usually bring in another half-dimension. (Movies bring in another whole dimension. That screen magnetism is something secret – if you could only figure out what it is and how to make it, you’d have a really good product to sell. But you can’t even tell if someone has it until you actually see them up there on the screen. You have to give screen tests to find out.)”
Andy Warhol, The Philosophy of Andy Warhol, p. 63.
“The resulting films drastically reduced the roles of director and viewer alike. The director’s function was limited to choosing the subject, setting up the shot, turning the camera on and off and deciding whether or not to exhibit the result. And the viewer, for the first time in the history of the commercial exploitation of persistence-of-vision, was relieved of the obligation—perhaps even a large part of the desire—to pay attention to the screen. The standard ‘film-as-wallpaper’ definition of the early Warhol films doesn’t stand up, since their entire meaning and effect spring from the fact of their projection on a screen in a darkened room.”
Tony Rayns, writer in “Andy Warhol: Film Factory”
“The many Screen Tests evidence a variety of behavior of its portrait subjects, but amazingly little improvisation. The subjects actually look like they are captured and about to be interrogated, but the interrogation never happens, because Andy wanted to capture the essence of the person only, no interference, just like no interference with the camera as it recorded each “moving” still-life. The “Screen Tests” rank in the Warhol pantheon along with the Campbell’s Soup cans, Marilyns, and self-portraits.”
Billy Name-Linich, Factory photographer
Materials
Video Camera
Videotape
TV
VCR
Direct Light Source (to create strong contrast between light and shadow)
Variety of Props and Costumes (wigs, hats, sunglasses, feather boas, etc.)
Project Procedure:
Familiarize yourself with Warhol’s Screen Tests and process:
Extension: Students will create a written character sketch of three personalities captured in the class screen test.
Assessment and Wrap-up:
As a group, watch the screen test tape and discuss the on-screen personalities. Based upon the footage, students determine which person would be best suited for various film roles: a villain, a best friend, a hero or a royal personage, etc. Students also critique the formal quality of their screen tests.